Conclusions
SB1 not a radical redefinition of GW laws but a start towards addressing emerging water resources problems in Texas
No specific provisions for Ogallala
Full effect will not be known until development of management plans
Some speculation of experts
Notes:
In conclusion, SB1 is not a radical redefinition of groundwater laws in Texas but it is a step in the right direction towards addressing the emerging water resources problem in Texas. It is only the beginning and not the end.
No specific provisions are given for the Ogallala or any aquifer, but many of the provisions will effect the High Plains region. Parts of the region will certainly qualify as a priority area, and management plans should force districts to take more action. Theoretically, these districts could set well spacing and withdrawal requirements, but whether this will happen remains to be seen.
Thus, the full effect of SB1 will not be known until the adoption of these plans or even later.
Some experts see SB1 as the first step in a long process of reform that could eventually lead to an end of right of capture laws and also open the door for profit water marketing. Others thinks that continued resistance could put Senate Bill 1 on the shelf indefinitely. So opinions vary considerably.